From 5d490603a6d60298162cbd32ec45f736b58929fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:54:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] client rpc: Fix error checking after poll()

First 'poll' can't return EWOULDBLOCK, and second, we're checking errno
so far away from the poll() call that we've probably already trashed the
original errno value.
---
 src/rpc/virnetclient.c | 15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/rpc/virnetclient.c b/src/rpc/virnetclient.c
index 033fda6e19..49d238e273 100644
--- a/src/rpc/virnetclient.c
+++ b/src/rpc/virnetclient.c
@@ -1347,6 +1347,12 @@ static int virNetClientIOEventLoop(virNetClientPtr client,
 
         virNetClientLock(client);
 
+        if (ret < 0) {
+            virReportSystemError(errno,
+                                 "%s", _("poll on socket failed"));
+            goto error;
+        }
+
         if (virKeepAliveTrigger(client->keepalive, &msg)) {
             client->wantClose = true;
         } else if (msg && virNetClientQueueNonBlocking(client, msg) < 0) {
@@ -1375,15 +1381,6 @@ static int virNetClientIOEventLoop(virNetClientPtr client,
             }
         }
 
-        if (ret < 0) {
-            /* XXX what's this dubious errno check doing ? */
-            if (errno == EWOULDBLOCK)
-                continue;
-            virReportSystemError(errno,
-                                 "%s", _("poll on socket failed"));
-            goto error;
-        }
-
         if (fds[0].revents & POLLOUT) {
             if (virNetClientIOHandleOutput(client) < 0)
                 goto error;
-- 
2.39.5