From: Andrew Cooper Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:21:00 +0000 (+0100) Subject: x86/spec_ctrl: Read MSR_ARCH_CAPABILITIES only once X-Git-Url: http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d6c65187252a6c1810fd24c4d46f812840de8d3c;p=people%2Fiwj%2Fxen.git x86/spec_ctrl: Read MSR_ARCH_CAPABILITIES only once Make it available from the beginning of init_speculation_mitigations(), and pass it into appropriate functions. Fix an RSBA typo while moving the affected comment. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Reviewed-by: Wei Liu Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich Release-acked-by: Juergen Gross --- diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c b/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c index 037e84dc13..4ab0f50106 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c @@ -97,18 +97,15 @@ static int __init parse_bti(const char *s) } custom_param("bti", parse_bti); -static void __init print_details(enum ind_thunk thunk) +static void __init print_details(enum ind_thunk thunk, uint64_t caps) { unsigned int _7d0 = 0, e8b = 0, tmp; - uint64_t caps = 0; /* Collect diagnostics about available mitigations. */ if ( boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level >= 7 ) cpuid_count(7, 0, &tmp, &tmp, &tmp, &_7d0); if ( boot_cpu_data.extended_cpuid_level >= 0x80000008 ) cpuid(0x80000008, &tmp, &e8b, &tmp, &tmp); - if ( _7d0 & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPS) ) - rdmsrl(MSR_ARCH_CAPABILITIES, caps); printk(XENLOG_DEBUG "Speculative mitigation facilities:\n"); @@ -142,7 +139,7 @@ static void __init print_details(enum ind_thunk thunk) } /* Calculate whether Retpoline is known-safe on this CPU. */ -static bool __init retpoline_safe(void) +static bool __init retpoline_safe(uint64_t caps) { unsigned int ucode_rev = this_cpu(ucode_cpu_info).cpu_sig.rev; @@ -153,19 +150,12 @@ static bool __init retpoline_safe(void) boot_cpu_data.x86 != 6 ) return false; - if ( boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPS) ) - { - uint64_t caps; - - rdmsrl(MSR_ARCH_CAPABILITIES, caps); - - /* - * RBSA may be set by a hypervisor to indicate that we may move to a - * processor which isn't retpoline-safe. - */ - if ( caps & ARCH_CAPS_RSBA ) - return false; - } + /* + * RSBA may be set by a hypervisor to indicate that we may move to a + * processor which isn't retpoline-safe. + */ + if ( caps & ARCH_CAPS_RSBA ) + return false; switch ( boot_cpu_data.x86_model ) { @@ -299,6 +289,10 @@ void __init init_speculation_mitigations(void) { enum ind_thunk thunk = THUNK_DEFAULT; bool ibrs = false; + uint64_t caps = 0; + + if ( boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPS) ) + rdmsrl(MSR_ARCH_CAPABILITIES, caps); /* * Has the user specified any custom BTI mitigations? If so, follow their @@ -327,7 +321,7 @@ void __init init_speculation_mitigations(void) * On Intel hardware, we'd like to use retpoline in preference to * IBRS, but only if it is safe on this hardware. */ - else if ( retpoline_safe() ) + else if ( retpoline_safe(caps) ) thunk = THUNK_RETPOLINE; else if ( boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBRSB) ) ibrs = true; @@ -418,7 +412,7 @@ void __init init_speculation_mitigations(void) else setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_NO_XPTI); - print_details(thunk); + print_details(thunk, caps); } static void __init __maybe_unused build_assertions(void)