From: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 15:39:10 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: cpu: CPU model names have to match on ppc64
X-Git-Url: http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?a=commitdiff_plain;h=96b2c7459cb689a27996c2d69131e245940bc533;p=libvirt.git

cpu: CPU model names have to match on ppc64

Limitations of the POWER architecture mean that you can't run
eg. a POWER7 guest on a POWER8 host when using KVM. This applies
to all guests, not just those using VIR_CPU_MATCH_STRICT in the
CPU definition; in fact, exact and strict CPU matching are
basically the same on ppc64.

This means, of course, that hosts using different CPUs have to be
considered incompatible as well.

Change ppc64Compute(), called by cpuGuestData(), to reflect this
fact and update test cases accordingly.

Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250977
---

diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_ppc64.c b/src/cpu/cpu_ppc64.c
index 53d8fb00d8..07699568a3 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu_ppc64.c
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu_ppc64.c
@@ -350,7 +350,6 @@ ppc64Compute(virCPUDefPtr host,
              const virCPUDef *cpu,
              virCPUDataPtr *guestData,
              char **message)
-
 {
     struct ppc64_map *map = NULL;
     struct ppc64_model *host_model = NULL;
@@ -407,9 +406,7 @@ ppc64Compute(virCPUDefPtr host,
         !(guest_model = ppc64ModelFromCPU(cpu, map)))
         goto cleanup;
 
-    if (cpu->type == VIR_CPU_TYPE_GUEST &&
-        cpu->match == VIR_CPU_MATCH_STRICT &&
-        STRNEQ(guest_model->name, host_model->name)) {
+    if (STRNEQ(guest_model->name, host_model->name)) {
         VIR_DEBUG("host CPU model does not match required CPU model %s",
                   guest_model->name);
         if (message &&
diff --git a/tests/cputest.c b/tests/cputest.c
index 93f9d2ec88..1e84fd3efd 100644
--- a/tests/cputest.c
+++ b/tests/cputest.c
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static const char *model486[]   = { "486" };
 static const char *nomodel[]    = { "nomodel" };
 static const char *models[]     = { "qemu64", "core2duo", "Nehalem" };
 static const char *haswell[]    = { "SandyBridge", "Haswell" };
-static const char *ppc_models[]     = { "POWER7", "POWER7_v2.1", "POWER8_v1.0"};
+static const char *ppc_models[] = { "POWER7", "POWER7_v2.1", "POWER7_v2.3", "POWER8_v1.0"};
 
 static int
 mymain(void)
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ mymain(void)
                       NULL, "Haswell-noTSX", 0);
 
     DO_TEST_GUESTDATA("ppc64", "host", "guest", ppc_models, NULL, 0);
-    DO_TEST_GUESTDATA("ppc64", "host", "guest-nofallback", ppc_models, "POWER7_v2.1", 0);
+    DO_TEST_GUESTDATA("ppc64", "host", "guest-nofallback", ppc_models, "POWER7_v2.1", -1);
 
     return ret == 0 ? EXIT_SUCCESS : EXIT_FAILURE;
 }
diff --git a/tests/cputestdata/ppc64-guest.xml b/tests/cputestdata/ppc64-guest.xml
index ac81ec0adc..9e91501002 100644
--- a/tests/cputestdata/ppc64-guest.xml
+++ b/tests/cputestdata/ppc64-guest.xml
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 <cpu match='exact'>
-  <model>POWER8_v1.0</model>
+  <model>POWER7_v2.3</model>
   <topology sockets='2' cores='4' threads='1'/>
 </cpu>
diff --git a/tests/cputestdata/ppc64-host+guest,ppc_models-result.xml b/tests/cputestdata/ppc64-host+guest,ppc_models-result.xml
index 0cb0830324..3e55f68f50 100644
--- a/tests/cputestdata/ppc64-host+guest,ppc_models-result.xml
+++ b/tests/cputestdata/ppc64-host+guest,ppc_models-result.xml
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 <cpu mode='custom' match='exact'>
   <arch>ppc64</arch>
-  <model fallback='allow'>POWER8_v1.0</model>
+  <model fallback='allow'>POWER7_v2.3</model>
   <vendor>IBM</vendor>
 </cpu>
diff --git a/tests/cputestdata/ppc64-host+guest-nofallback,ppc_models,POWER7_v2.1-result.xml b/tests/cputestdata/ppc64-host+guest-nofallback,ppc_models,POWER7_v2.1-result.xml
deleted file mode 100644
index 7e58361712..0000000000
--- a/tests/cputestdata/ppc64-host+guest-nofallback,ppc_models,POWER7_v2.1-result.xml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-<cpu mode='custom' match='exact'>
-  <arch>ppc64</arch>
-  <model fallback='forbid'>POWER7_v2.1</model>
-  <vendor>IBM</vendor>
-</cpu>