From: Ian Jackson Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:07:33 +0000 (+0100) Subject: passthrough: fix segmentation fault after hotplug pass-through device X-Git-Tag: xen-3.4.3 X-Git-Url: http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?a=commitdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;p=qemu-xen-3.4-testing.git passthrough: fix segmentation fault after hotplug pass-through device This patch fixed the QEMU segmentation fault after hotplug pass-through devices with MSI-X for many times. There is a wrong boundary check in cpu_register_io_memory that uses io_index rather than io_mem_nb. After many times of hotplug of MSI-X pass-through device, io_mem_read[] got extended to overwrite mmio_cnt, then cause QEMU segmentation fault. This fix sync with upstream QEMU code in exec.c, and free unused io_mem_XXX element after hot removal. Signed-off-by: Zhai Edwin (cherry picked from commit b5160622517fb2d16d0836172a2e34633c9d94bf) --- diff --git a/hw/pt-msi.c b/hw/pt-msi.c index 9f4a3b3e..f6a12267 100644 --- a/hw/pt-msi.c +++ b/hw/pt-msi.c @@ -618,5 +618,11 @@ void pt_msix_delete(struct pt_dev *dev) munmap(dev->msix->phys_iomem_base, dev->msix->total_entries * 16); } + if (dev->msix->mmio_index > 0) + { + cpu_unregister_io_memory(dev->msix->mmio_index); + } + + free(dev->msix); } diff --git a/i386-dm/exec-dm.c b/i386-dm/exec-dm.c index 45fc8e5a..12adede1 100644 --- a/i386-dm/exec-dm.c +++ b/i386-dm/exec-dm.c @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ unsigned long qemu_host_page_mask; CPUWriteMemoryFunc *io_mem_write[IO_MEM_NB_ENTRIES][4]; CPUReadMemoryFunc *io_mem_read[IO_MEM_NB_ENTRIES][4]; void *io_mem_opaque[IO_MEM_NB_ENTRIES]; -static int io_mem_nb = 1; +char io_mem_used[IO_MEM_NB_ENTRIES]; /* log support */ FILE *logfile; @@ -310,6 +310,20 @@ void cpu_register_physical_memory(target_phys_addr_t start_addr, mmio[mmio_cnt++].size = size; } +static int get_free_io_mem_idx(void) +{ + int i; + + /* Leave 1st element empty */ + for (i = 1; i= IO_MEM_NB_ENTRIES) - return -1; - io_index = io_mem_nb++; + io_index = get_free_io_mem_idx(); + if (io_index == -1) + return io_index; } else { if (io_index >= IO_MEM_NB_ENTRIES) return -1; @@ -357,6 +371,7 @@ void cpu_unregister_io_memory(int io_table_address) io_mem_write[io_index][i] = NULL; } io_mem_opaque[io_index] = NULL; + io_mem_used[io_index] = 0; } CPUWriteMemoryFunc **cpu_get_io_memory_write(int io_index)