We can use VIR_REALLOC_N with NULL pointer, which behaves the same way
as VIR_ALLOC_N in that case, so no need for a condition that's
checking if some data are allocated already.
---
I tried to find other parts of the code similar to this, so I can do a
full cleanup for the whole repository, so I used this (excuse the long
line, but that's how I was writing it):
git grep -nHC 5 -e VIR_REALLOC_N -e VIR_ALLOC_N | while read line; do if [[ "$line" == "--" ]]; then if [[ ${#tmpbuf} -gt 10 && "$REALLOC_N" == "true" && "$ALLOC_N" == "true" ]]; then echo $line; while [[ ${#tmpbuf[*]} -gt 0 ]]; do echo "${tmpbuf[0]}"; tmpbuf=( "${tmpbuf[@]:1:${#tmpbuf[*]}}" ); done; fi; unset tmpbuf REALLOC_N ALLOC_N; else if [[ "$ALLOC_N" != "true" && "${line/VIR_ALLOC_N//}" != "${line}" ]]; then ALLOC_N="true"; fi; if [[ "$REALLOC_N" != "true" && "${line/VIR_REALLOC_N//}" != "${line}" ]]; then REALLOC_N="true"; fi; tmpbuf[${#tmpbuf[*]}]="$line"; fi; done | less
And reviewed the output just to find out this was the only occurrence of
the inconsistency.
* the policy specified explicitly as def->cpuset.
*/
if (def->cpumask) {
- if (!def->cputune.vcpupin) {
- if (VIR_ALLOC_N(def->cputune.vcpupin, def->vcpus) < 0) {
- virReportOOMError();
- goto error;
- }
- } else {
- if (VIR_REALLOC_N(def->cputune.vcpupin, def->vcpus) < 0) {
- virReportOOMError();
- goto error;
- }
+ if (VIR_REALLOC_N(def->cputune.vcpupin, def->vcpus) < 0) {
+ virReportOOMError();
+ goto error;
}
for (i = 0; i < def->vcpus; i++) {