The operation's success can't be controlled by the guest, as the device
model may have an active mapping of the page. If we nevertheless
permitted this operation, we'd have to add further TLB flushing to
prevent scenarios like
"Domains A (HVM), B (PV), C (PV); B->target==A
Steps:
1. B maps page X from A as writable
2. B unmaps page X without a TLB flush
3. A sends page X to C via GNTTABOP_transfer
4. C maps page X as pagetable (potentially causing a TLB flush in C,
but not in B)
At this point, X would be mapped as a pagetable in C while being
writable through a stale TLB entry in B."
A similar scenario could be constructed for A using XENMEM_exchange and
some arbitrary PV domain C then having this page allocated.
This is XSA-217.
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
master commit:
fae7d5be8bb8b7a5b7005c4f3b812a47661a721e
master date: 2017-06-20 14:29:51 +0200
bool_t drop_dom_ref = 0;
const struct domain *owner = dom_xen;
+ if ( paging_mode_external(d) )
+ return -1;
+
spin_lock(&d->page_alloc_lock);
if ( is_xen_heap_page(page) || ((owner = page_get_owner(page)) != d) )