I had intended to make these changes to commit
d40b820c before
pushing, but forgot about it during the day between the initial review
and ACK.
Neither change is significant - just returning immediately when
virNetDevGetName() fails (instead of logging a debug message first)
and eliminating a comment that adds to confusion rather than
eliminating it. Still, the changes should be made to be more
consistent with nearly identical code just a few lines up (added in
commit
7282f455)
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@laine.org>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
ifname = virNetDevGetName(nh->rtnh_ifindex);
- if (ifname)
- accept_ra = virNetDevIPGetAcceptRA(ifname);
+ if (!ifname)
+ return -1;
+
+ accept_ra = virNetDevIPGetAcceptRA(ifname);
VIR_DEBUG("Checking multipath route nexthop device %s (%d), accept_ra: %d",
ifname, nh->rtnh_ifindex, accept_ra);
- if (!ifname ||
- (accept_ra != 2 && virNetDevIPCheckIPv6ForwardingAddIF(data, &ifname) < 0)) {
+ if (accept_ra != 2 && virNetDevIPCheckIPv6ForwardingAddIF(data, &ifname) < 0)
return -1;
- }
- VIR_FREE(ifname); /* in case it wasn't added to the array */
+ VIR_FREE(ifname);
data->hasRARoutes = true;
len -= NLMSG_ALIGN(nh->rtnh_len);