If the very first allocation has a length of 0, the free_cluster_index
is still 0 after the for loop, which means that subtracting one from it
will underflow and signal an invalid range of clusters by returning
-EFBIG. However, there is no such range, as its length is 0.
Fix this by preventing underflows on free_cluster_index during the
check.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
/* Make sure that all offsets in the "allocated" range are representable
* in an int64_t */
- if (s->free_cluster_index - 1 > (INT64_MAX >> s->cluster_bits)) {
+ if (s->free_cluster_index > 0 &&
+ s->free_cluster_index - 1 > (INT64_MAX >> s->cluster_bits))
+ {
return -EFBIG;
}