GCC9 is confused by this comment when building with CFLAG
-Wimplicit-fallthrough=2:
vl.c: In function ‘qemu_ref_timedate’:
vl.c:773:15: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
773 | value -= rtc_realtime_clock_offset;
| ~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vl.c:775:5: note: here
775 | case QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL:
| ^~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Rewrite the comment using 'fall through' which is recognized by
GCC and static analyzers.
Reported-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <
20190719131425.10835-7-philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
switch (clock) {
case QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME:
value -= rtc_realtime_clock_offset;
- /* no break */
+ /* fall through */
case QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL:
value += rtc_ref_start_datetime;
break;