Since this logic was introduced, opt_tsx has become more complicated and
shouldn't be compared to 0 directly. While there are no buggy logic paths,
the correct expression is !(opt_tsx & 1) but the rtm_disabled boolean is
easier and clearer to use.
Fixes: 8fe24090d940 ("x86/cpuid: Rework HLE and RTM handling")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
master commit:
31f3bc97f4508687215e459a5e35676eecf1772b
master date: 2022-01-05 09:44:26 +0000
*/
if ( opt_srb_lock == -1 &&
(caps & (ARCH_CAPS_MDS_NO|ARCH_CAPS_TAA_NO)) == ARCH_CAPS_MDS_NO &&
- (!cpu_has_hle || ((caps & ARCH_CAPS_TSX_CTRL) && opt_tsx == 0)) )
+ (!cpu_has_hle || ((caps & ARCH_CAPS_TSX_CTRL) && rtm_disabled)) )
opt_srb_lock = 0;
val &= ~MCU_OPT_CTRL_RNGDS_MITG_DIS;