xc_cpuid_apply_policy() provides compatibility for migration of a pre-4.14 VM
where no CPUID data was provided in the stream.
It guesses the various max-leaf limits, based on what was true at the time of
writing, but this was not correctly adapted when speculative security issues
forced the advertisement of new feature bits. Of note are:
* LFENCE-DISPATCH, in leaf 0x80000021.eax
* BHI-CTRL, in leaf 0x7[2].edx
In both cases, a VM booted on a security-patched Xen 4.13, and then migrated
on to any newer version of Xen on the same or compatible hardware would have
these features stripped back because Xen is still editing the cpu-policy for
sanity behind the back of the toolstack.
For VMs using BHI_DIS_S to mitigate Native-BHI, this resulted in a failure to
restore the guests MSR_SPEC_CTRL setting:
(XEN) HVM d7v0 load MSR 0x48 with value 0x401 failed
(XEN) HVM7 restore: failed to load entry 20/0 rc -6
Fixes: e9b4fe263649 ("x86/cpuid: support LFENCE always serialising CPUID bit")
Fixes: f3709b15fc86 ("x86/cpuid: Infrastructure for cpuid word 7:2.edx")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
*
* This restore path is used for incoming VMs with no CPUID data
* i.e. originated on Xen 4.13 or earlier. We must invent a policy
- * compatible with what Xen 4.13 would have done on the same hardware.
+ * compatible with what a security-patched Xen 4.13 would have done on
+ * the same hardware.
*
* Specifically:
* - Clamp max leaves.
}
p->policy.basic.max_leaf = min(p->policy.basic.max_leaf, 0xdu);
- p->policy.feat.max_subleaf = 0;
- p->policy.extd.max_leaf = min(p->policy.extd.max_leaf, 0x8000001c);
+ p->policy.feat.max_subleaf = min(p->policy.feat.max_subleaf, 0x2u);
+ p->policy.extd.max_leaf = min(p->policy.extd.max_leaf, 0x80000021);
}
if ( featureset )