The helper function virCompareLimitUlong compares limit values,
where value of 0 is equal to unlimited. If the latter parameter is 0,
it should return -1 instead of 1, hence the user can only set hard_limit when
swap_hard_limit currently is unlimited.
Worse, all callers pass 2 64-bit values, but on 32-bit platforms,
the second argument was silently truncated to 32 bits, which
could lead to incorrect computations.
Signed-off-by: Bing Bu Cao <mars@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
* Returns 0 if the numbers are equal, -1 if b is greater, 1 if a is greater.
*/
int
-virCompareLimitUlong(unsigned long long a, unsigned long b)
+virCompareLimitUlong(unsigned long long a, unsigned long long b)
{
if (a == b)
return 0;
+ if (!b)
+ return -1;
+
if (a == 0 || a > b)
return 1;
char *virFindFCHostCapableVport(const char *sysfs_prefix);
-int virCompareLimitUlong(unsigned long long a, unsigned long b);
+int virCompareLimitUlong(unsigned long long a, unsigned long long b);
int virParseOwnershipIds(const char *label, uid_t *uidPtr, gid_t *gidPtr);