}
/*
- * x86's implementation of waitqueue violates the livepatching safey principle
+ * x86's implementation of waitqueue violates the livepatching safety principle
* of having unwound every CPUs stack before modifying live content.
*
* Search through every domain and check that no vCPUs have an active
/*
* Patches which have been applied. Need RCU in case we crash (and then
- * traps code would iterate via applied_list) when adding entries onthe list.
+ * traps code would iterate via applied_list) when adding entries on the list.
*/
static DEFINE_RCU_READ_LOCK(rcu_applied_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(applied_list);
/*
* Total of all three regions - RX, RW, and RO. We have to have
- * keep them in seperate pages so we PAGE_ALIGN the RX and RW to have
- * them on seperate pages. The last one will by default fall on its
+ * keep them in separate pages so we PAGE_ALIGN the RX and RW to have
+ * them on separate pages. The last one will by default fall on its
* own page.
*/
size = PAGE_ALIGN(payload->text_size) + PAGE_ALIGN(payload->rw_size) +
return 0;
/*
- * The payload is not a final image as we dynmically link against it.
+ * The payload is not a final image as we dynamically link against it.
* As such the linker has left symbols we don't care about and which
* binutils would have removed had it be a final image. Hence we:
* - For SHF_ALLOC - ignore symbols referring to sections that are not
/*
* Check if payload has any of the vetoing, non-atomic hooks assigned.
- * A vetoing, non-atmic hook may perform an operation that changes the
+ * A vetoing, non-atomic hook may perform an operation that changes the
* hypervisor state and may not be guaranteed to succeed. Result of
* such operation may be returned and may change the livepatch workflow.
* Such hooks may require additional cleanup actions performed by other