view net/ax25/TODO @ 673:3161879fdf22

[IA64] xencomm: support XENMEM_add_to_physmap and XENMEM_remove_from_phsymap

support XENMEM_add_to_physmap and XENMEM_remove_from_phsymap.

Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
author Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
date Tue Sep 16 21:26:15 2008 +0900 (2008-09-16)
parents 831230e53067
line source
1 Do the ax25_list_lock, ax25_dev_lock, linkfail_lockreally, ax25_frag_lock and
2 listen_lock have to be bh-safe?
4 Do the netrom and rose locks have to be bh-safe?
6 A device might be deleted after lookup in the SIOCADDRT ioctl but before it's
7 being used.
9 Routes to a device being taken down might be deleted by ax25_rt_device_down
10 but added by somebody else before the device has been deleted fully.
12 Massive amounts of lock_kernel / unlock_kernel are just a temporary solution to
13 get around the removal of SOCKOPS_WRAP. A serious locking strategy has to be
14 implemented.
16 The ax25_rt_find_route synopsys is pervert but I somehow had to deal with
17 the race caused by the static variable in it's previous implementation.
19 Implement proper socket locking in netrom and rose.
21 Check socket locking when ax25_rcv is sending to raw sockets. In particular
22 ax25_send_to_raw() seems fishy. Heck - ax25_rcv is fishy.
24 Handle XID and TEST frames properly.