direct-io.hg

changeset 14358:f2f83691f714

docs: update some todo items.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com>
author kfraser@localhost.localdomain
date Tue Mar 13 09:52:11 2007 +0000 (2007-03-13)
parents 468ec3d142ad
children 2f63ed3c5fb9
files docs/xen-api/todo.tex
line diff
     1.1 --- a/docs/xen-api/todo.tex	Tue Mar 13 09:07:55 2007 +0000
     1.2 +++ b/docs/xen-api/todo.tex	Tue Mar 13 09:52:11 2007 +0000
     1.3 @@ -91,17 +91,10 @@ same subnet.
     1.4  
     1.5  \end{itemize}
     1.6  
     1.7 -\item TPM
     1.8 +\item ACM
     1.9  \begin{itemize}
    1.10  
    1.11 -\item Would it not be better to have a class TPM and a member TPMs ((TPM ref)
    1.12 -Set) containing an array of zero or one references to TPMs? I assume that
    1.13 -an empty array would make it clear that no TPM is associated with the VM
    1.14 -instead of encoding its existence into TPM/instance or TPM/backend
    1.15 -somehow. The current members instance and backend could then be moved into
    1.16 -the TPM class.
    1.17 -
    1.18 -\item Also a Xen system can be running an access control policy where each
    1.19 +\item A Xen system can be running an access control policy where each
    1.20  VM's run-time access to resources is restricted by the label it has been given
    1.21  compared to those of the resources. Currently a VM's configuration file may
    1.22  contain a line like access\_control[policy='$<$name of the system's